Comments on: Substance, Part III http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/substance-part-iii/ Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:46:24 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Good Times | ducksanddrakes http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/substance-part-iii/#comment-180 Good Times | ducksanddrakes Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:33:11 +0000 http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-180 [...] on Jonathan Gottschall’s efforts to make litcrit more like the sciences (Part I, Part II, Part III and there’s also this), probably just because Gottschall got a lot of press last year. There [...] [...] on Jonathan Gottschall’s efforts to make litcrit more like the sciences (Part I, Part II, Part III and there’s also this), probably just because Gottschall got a lot of press last year. There [...]

]]> By: C Notes « Ducks and Drakes http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/substance-part-iii/#comment-138 C Notes « Ducks and Drakes Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:33:12 +0000 http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-138 [...] on Jonathan Gottschall’s efforts to make litcrit more like the sciences (Part I, Part II, Part III and there’s also this), probably just because Gottschall got a lot of press last year. There [...] [...] on Jonathan Gottschall’s efforts to make litcrit more like the sciences (Part I, Part II, Part III and there’s also this), probably just because Gottschall got a lot of press last year. There [...]

]]> By: Perpetuate http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/substance-part-iii/#comment-38 Perpetuate Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:53:41 +0000 http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-38 Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit. cheers, Perpetuate Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.

cheers, Perpetuate

]]> By: Paul Weinhold http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/substance-part-iii/#comment-23 Paul Weinhold Sat, 17 May 2008 01:54:00 +0000 http://ducksanddrakes.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-23 Neil, I've enjoyed reading your series of posts on the Gottschall article. It seems to me that you employed the very same rhetorical strategy you so adeptly unveiled. Brilliant. Neil, I’ve enjoyed reading your series of posts on the Gottschall article. It seems to me that you employed the very same rhetorical strategy you so adeptly unveiled. Brilliant.

]]>